The global shift toward zero-emission power generation is forcing gas turbine technology through one of its most radical evolutions in decades. As operators and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) move from natural gas to high-hydrogen fuel blends, and ultimately 100% hydrogen, the operating environment inside the combustion chamber changes radically.

Hydrogen burns faster, at higher temperatures, and with significantly higher flame speeds compared to traditional fuels. These combustion characteristics trigger intense thermoacoustic instabilities, severe dynamic pressure oscillations, and unprecedented thermal stresses on critical hot-gas path components. Furthermore, harsh thermochemical phenomena associated with hydrogen combustion can accelerate material degradation and reduce overall component performance over time.

From an operational standpoint, these combined effects introduce major challenges regarding dynamic stability and machine vibration. Uncontrolled dynamic behavior not only threatens operational continuity, but it can also increase noise pollution and environmental exposure in the surrounding area. For engineering and maintenance teams, this transition represents a major asset-reliability challenge. Rather than rendering existing equipment obsolete overnight, it has driven the power generation industry into an active phase of rapid adaptation and redesign. In this evolving landscape, Additive Manufacturing (AM) is playing a pivotal role, enabling the innovation and structural optimization required to meet these demanding new combustion environments.

In order to mitigate combustion instabilities and handle extreme thermal loads, gas turbine design increasingly leverages Additive Manufacturing (AM). Traditional casting and machining impose severe geometric constraints, whereas industrial AM overcomes these boundaries to enable highly intricate, monolithic assemblies tailored for hydrogen-ready architectures. This design freedom enables the direct integration of micro-swirlers, complex fuel manifolds, advanced cooling channels, and lightweight structural brackets into single build components, such as burners, turbine blades, and combustor liners, reducing assembly complexity and eliminating potential leak paths. However, deploying AM components into high-vibration environments introduces complex dynamic hurdles. Structural damping serves as the primary line of defense against High-Cycle Fatigue (HCF) failure when thermoacoustic oscillations excite the structure.

This article is part of our Frontiers in Power publication. Download to get the full issue.

This article covers:

• Additive manufacturing and the challenge of structural damping
• Bridging simulation and reality: A practical methodology for AM components
• Boundary condition selection: Evaluating system dynamics for reliable testing
• Iterative FEA calibration via the half-power bandwidth method
• Practical implications for asset reliability